You are currently browsing the archives for the Royal Courts of Justice category.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
15/10/2007 by fotag.
Dear Mr Lloyds TSB,
Following our writ issued on 9th October we would like to request you ‘get out of that one’ since you have already confirmed “…you didn’t make a mistake…” followed by “…we were unwitting parties to the fraud…”. No doubt Mr Fitzwilliams might be more than aware of “unwitting” element of your statement.
See you in court.
A Friend.
Posted in Royal Courts of Justice, Lloyds TSB | No Comments »
12/09/2007 by fotag.
So, going to court; all of a sudden the Bill of Exchange and Cheque Acts no longer apply.
“we didn’t make a mistake” and “we were unwitting parties to the fraud” were 2 such statements from The Bank which seem to contradict one another - see you in Court Lloyds TSB, eh?
So, if you want to launder your money; if you want to get any old cheques paid into any old account; if you want to dupe the General Public into parting with £millions, please give your local Lloyds TSB a shout - they offer this as a ‘value add’ to their clients.
No doubt once the criminal case against the fraudsters also starts, they and the DTI will be paying the price for ignoring both their duty and their inability to spot an event “…which has all the hallmarks of a large scale fraud…”* when they see one.
*Case Number HC04 C00197 - Justice Henderson presiding.
Posted in Royal Courts of Justice, DTI, Lloyds TSB | No Comments »